<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Baileyfields Employment Solicitors &#187; employee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baileyfields.com/tag/employee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baileyfields.com</link>
	<description>Baileyfields Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:16:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Contractor or Employee: Can you tell the difference?</title>
		<link>http://www.baileyfields.com/2010/02/17/contractor-or-employee-can-you-tell-the-difference/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baileyfields.com/2010/02/17/contractor-or-employee-can-you-tell-the-difference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orchardlatest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://baileyfields.com/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is not uncommon for contractors to quite happily agree that they are self employed and so benefit from preferential tax treatments and flexibility during the course of working and then, once the assignment is terminated, seek to make a claim for unfair dismissal on the basis that they were actually an employee.
It is therefore [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not uncommon for contractors to quite happily agree that they are self employed and so benefit from preferential tax treatments and flexibility during the course of working and then, once the assignment is terminated, seek to make a claim for unfair dismissal on the basis that they were actually an employee.<br />
It is therefore important that whatever the relationship, it is correctly documented in writing and the parties work in accordance with the contract.</p>
<p>Read the full article at <a href="http://www.baileyfields.com/orchardnews">http://www.baileyfields.com/orchardnews</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baileyfields.com/2010/02/17/contractor-or-employee-can-you-tell-the-difference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Redundancy: How to ensure a fair selection</title>
		<link>http://www.baileyfields.com/2008/11/23/redundancy-how-to-ensure-a-fair-selection/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baileyfields.com/2008/11/23/redundancy-how-to-ensure-a-fair-selection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 11:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orchardlatest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[redundancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/baileyfields/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A selection criteria is necessary in a redundancy situation when an employer plans to make more than one employee redundant and the employees chosen have the same job or interchangeable jobs, or the groups of employees perform identical work.
Therefore the very first thing that the employer must do is make a clear statement identifying the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A selection criteria is necessary in a redundancy situation when an employer plans to make more than one employee redundant and the employees chosen have the same job or interchangeable jobs, or the groups of employees perform identical work.</p>
<p>Therefore the very first thing that the employer must do is make a clear statement identifying the pool of employees from which the redundancies are to be sought, for example the marketing staff at head office or the fitters at the Ashford plant.</p>
<p>The selection criteria used by the employer must be carefully and exactly defined so that they can be fairly and consistently applied to each employee.</p>
<p>Selection criteria for redundancy may include some kind of measure of skills, qualifications, aptitude or performance.</p>
<p>When devising a selection criteria an employer should be cautious if s/he intends to include a length of service criteria or “last in first out” as this may expose the employer to an age discrimination claim.</p>
<p>There is also the risk of it being indirectly discriminatory against female employees because they tend to have shorter service due to, for example, breaks to have children.</p>
<p>If attendance is used as a criteria this could in particular circumstances trigger a disability discrimination claim.  Care should also be taken to ensure that absence due to pregnancy-related illness and absence on maternity or other family-friendly leave is discounted.</p>
<p>Using the correct selection criteria can be the solution to keeping the best performing employees and making the poor performers redundant. It is likely that  the pool of employees will probably contain both good and poor performers, hence if the employer’s aim is to target under performing employees the performance-related criteria should be weighted by a percentage factor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baileyfields.com/2008/11/23/redundancy-how-to-ensure-a-fair-selection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advertising: Age Discrimination</title>
		<link>http://www.baileyfields.com/2008/11/23/advertising-age-discrimination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.baileyfields.com/2008/11/23/advertising-age-discrimination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 10:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orchardlatest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[career]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recruitment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/baileyfields/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employers should consider whether it is necessary to specify in an advert that a certain level of experience is required. A tribunal has found that an advert stating that a teaching vacancy “would suit candidates in the first five years of their career” amounted to indirect age discrimination.

When a teaching vacancy arose Milton Keynes Local [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Employers should consider whether it is necessary to specify in an advert that a certain level of experience is required. A tribunal has found that an advert stating that a teaching vacancy “would suit candidates in the first five years of their career” amounted to indirect age discrimination.<br />
<span id="more-17"></span><br />
When a teaching vacancy arose Milton Keynes Local Education Authority advertised for candidates in “the first five years of their career”. The school wanted to appoint someone on the same pay scale as the departing employee.</p>
<blockquote><p>“would suit candidates in the first five years of their career”</p></blockquote>
<p>Mrs Rainbow was a 61-year old teacher with 34 years’ teaching experience. When she requested an application pack from the school she was told to send in a letter of application only. Unlike other candidates, she did not receive an application form, job description or person specification.</p>
<p>On failing to be short listed for the position, Mrs Rainbow brought claims of direct and indirect age discrimination.</p>
<p>Although the tribunal rejected her claim of direct discrimination, it found that the local authority had indirectly discriminated against her on the grounds of age.</p>
<p>The requirement to be in the first five years of their career put older individuals at a disadvantage because they were much more likely to have more than five years’ experience.</p>
<p>To ensure that your advertising complies with employment law regulations contact us. We can advise on all forms of recruitment advertising. Call us on 01233 822537.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.baileyfields.com/2008/11/23/advertising-age-discrimination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
